How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Ace 6T vs iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

OnePlus Ace 6T vs Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

What Ace 6T does better (6) and where iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) wins (8) — every spec side by side.

OnePlus Ace 6T
OnePlus · 2025Ace 6T
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)
Vivo · 2025iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $380
9.7Display9.6
9.5Performance9.4
8.9Camera8.9
9.6Battery9.5
9.3Features8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Ace 6TiQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)
77 × 163.48.176.6 × 163.88.2
Ace 6TiQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)Difference
Height163.4 mm163.8 mm−0.4 mm
Width77 mm76.6 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness8.1 mm8.2 mm−0.1 mm
Weight211 g212 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Ace 6T better than iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)?

  1. Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 6,800 mAh+22%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
  3. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,447 vs 9,153+14%
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) better than Ace 6T?

  1. AnTuTu score3,047,634 vs 3,176,093+4%
  2. Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
  3. Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+25%
  4. Max video4K vs 8K
  5. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+14%
  6. Pixel density450 ppi vs 510 ppi+13%
  7. Charged in 30 min65% vs 84%+29%
  8. Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,440 px+13%
Specifications

Side by side

OnePlus Ace 6TOnePlus Ace 6T≈ $3509.6
Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)≈ $3809.5
Design
Weight211 g212 g
Thickness8.1 mm8.2 mm
Height163.4 mm163.8 mm
Width77 mm76.6 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP65
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx5
Glass protectionCrystal Shield Glass—
ColoursBlack, Purple, GreenBlack, White, Blue
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,168 px
Pixel density450 ppi510 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.1%90.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 830
AnTuTu score3,047,6343,176,093
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,4479,153
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,154
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,300 mAh6,800 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Wired charging100 W120 W
Charged in 30 min65%84%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 5

Related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsOnePlus Ace 6TXiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsOnePlus Ace 6T9.69.6Xiaomi Redmi K90vsVivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)Xiaomi Redmi K90vsVivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)9.69.5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare