- android.gs
- Compare
- Ace 5 vs Redmi Turbo 3
OnePlus Ace 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
What Ace 5 does better (10) and where Redmi Turbo 3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display8.8
8.8Performance8.4
8.6Camera8.8
9.1Battery7.6
8.3Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace 5Redmi Turbo 3
| Ace 5 | Redmi Turbo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.7 mm | 160.5 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 179 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace 5 better than Redmi Turbo 3?
- Battery capacity6,415 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+28%
- AnTuTu score2,324,192 vs 1,823,082+27%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,400 nits+88%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,318 vs 4,989+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,597 vs 3,019+19%
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz+10%
- Charged in 30 min110% vs 100%+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,220 px+4%
Why is Redmi Turbo 3 better than Ace 5?
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Weight206 g vs 179 g+15%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.7 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Gray, White, Green | Black, Green, Titanium, Harry Potter |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,780 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,324,192 | 1,823,082 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,318 | 4,989 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,597 | 3,019 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,415 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 110% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HyperOS |
