- android.gs
- Compare
- Ace 5 Racing vs iQOO Z10 Turbo
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
What Ace 5 Racing does better (5) and where iQOO Z10 Turbo wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display9.6
9.1Performance8.7
8.1Camera8.1
9.3Battery9.5
6.9Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace 5 RacingiQOO Z10 Turbo
| Ace 5 Racing | iQOO Z10 Turbo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 163.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 212 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace 5 Racing better than iQOO Z10 Turbo?
- AnTuTu score2,536,961 vs 2,052,566+24%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,452 vs 6,503+15%
- Weight200 g vs 212 g+6%
- CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is iQOO Z10 Turbo better than Ace 5 Racing?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,400 nits3.4×
- Stereo speakersNo · Ace 5 Racing: Yes
- Battery capacity7,100 mAh vs 7,620 mAh+7%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 453 ppi+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Green | White, Black, Orange, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 4,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,536,961 | 2,052,566 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,452 | 6,503 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,100 mAh | 7,620 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | OriginOS 5 |
