- android.gs
- Compare
- Ace 3 vs Redmi K60
OnePlus Ace 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K60
What Ace 3 does better (11) and where Redmi K60 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace 3Redmi K60
| Ace 3 | Redmi K60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 162.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 199 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace 3 better than Redmi K60?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,400 nits3.2×
- AnTuTu score1,907,512 vs 1,425,621+34%
- Wired charging100 W vs 67 W+49%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx3+67%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,986 vs 4,041+23%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,648 vs 2,662+37%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Charged in 30 min111% vs 80%+39%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 87.5%+4%
Why is Redmi K60 better than Ace 3?
- Wireless chargingNo · Ace 3: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 526 ppi+17%
- Weight207 g vs 199 g+4%
- Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,440 px+14%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.6 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Rose Gold | Black, White, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,780 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,907,512 | 1,425,621 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,986 | 4,041 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,648 | 2,662 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 111% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | MIUI 14 |
