- android.gs
- Compare
- Ace 2V vs Redmi K60
OnePlus Ace 2V vs Xiaomi Redmi K60
What Ace 2V does better (10) and where Redmi K60 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace 2VRedmi K60
| Ace 2V | Redmi K60 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.6 mm | 162.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace 2V better than Redmi K60?
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,339 vs 4,041+7%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight192 g vs 199 g+4%
- Peak brightness1,450 nits vs 1,400 nits+4%
- Charged in 30 min94% vs 80%+18%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 87.5%+2%
Why is Redmi K60 better than Ace 2V?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Ace 2V: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Ace 2V: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- AnTuTu score1,374,907 vs 1,425,621+4%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 526 ppi+17%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,332 vs 2,662+14%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,440 px+16%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 162.6 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue/Green | Black, White, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,450 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,374,907 | 1,425,621 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,339 | 4,041 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,332 | 2,662 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | MIUI 14 |
