- android.gs
- Compare
- 9RT 5G vs nubia RedMagic 5S
OnePlus 9RT 5G vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 5S
What 9RT 5G does better (9) and where nubia RedMagic 5S wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display8.9
6.4Performance7.0
8.6Camera7.7
5.2Battery5.1
8.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
9RT 5Gnubia RedMagic 5S
| 9RT 5G | nubia RedMagic 5S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 168.6 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 78 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.8 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 220 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9RT 5G better than nubia RedMagic 5S?
- AnTuTu score670,289 vs 557,056+20%
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 5S: No
- Wired charging65 W vs 55 W+18%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight198 g vs 220 g+11%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 388 ppi+2%
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.8 mm+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 82.5%+7%
Why is nubia RedMagic 5S better than 9RT 5G?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,325 vs 13,4004×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 9RT 5G: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Charged in 30 min103% vs 112%+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.8 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue | Silver, Pulse |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 459 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 82.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 670,289 | 557,056 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,325 | 13,400 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,519 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 103% | 112% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 13 | — |
