- android.gs
- Compare
- 9R vs Galaxy M52
OnePlus 9R vs Samsung Galaxy M52
What 9R does better (10) and where Galaxy M52 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.2
8.3Camera7.5
5.2Battery5.3
8.7Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
9RGalaxy M52
| 9R | Galaxy M52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 164.2 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 173 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9R better than Galaxy M52?
- Wired charging65 W vs 25 W2.6×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy M52: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M52: No
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 393 ppi+2%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy M52 better than 9R?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Memory card slotNo · 9R: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight189 g vs 173 g+9%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 7.4 mm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Carbon Black, Lake Blue | White, Black, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Fluid AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 1,032,318 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,254 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,224 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 77% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 1.17 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 14 | One UI 3.1 |
