android.gs
Compare
9 Pro vs Black Shark 3S

OnePlus 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3S

What 9 Pro does better (16) and where Black Shark 3S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

OnePlus · 20219 Pro

9.0Score

16 advantages≈ $640

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2020Black Shark 3S

7.8Score

4 advantages≈ $650

8.3Display7.2

9.5Camera8.0

6.9Battery6.8

8.9Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

9 ProBlack Shark 3S

	9 Pro	Black Shark 3S	Difference
Height	163.2 mm	168.7 mm	−5.5 mm
Width	73.6 mm	77.3 mm	−3.7 mm
Thickness	8.7 mm	10.4 mm	−1.7 mm
Weight	197 g	222 g	−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 9 Pro better than Black Shark 3S?

Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 500 nits2.6×
Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 3S: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Black Shark 3S: No
NFCYes · Black Shark 3S: No
Pixel density525 ppi vs 395 ppi+33%
Rear cameras4 vs 22×
Max video8K vs 4K
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
Weight197 g vs 222 g+13%
USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%

Why is Black Shark 3S better than 9 Pro?

Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,729 mAh+5%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 9 Pro: Yes
Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OnePlus 9 Pro≈ $6409.0	Xiaomi Black Shark 3S≈ $6507.8
Design
Weight	197 g	222 g
Thickness	8.7 mm	10.4 mm
Height	163.2 mm	168.7 mm
Width	73.6 mm	77.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	—
Colours	Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black	Sky Cloud Black, Crystal Blue
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	3,216 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	525 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	500 nits
Measured brightness	859 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	82.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G	Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	5 nm	7 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.84 GHz	2.84 GHz
GPU	Adreno 660	Adreno 650
AnTuTu score	1,185,805	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,989	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,527	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	48 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.43"	1/1.72"
Rear cameras	4	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3.3×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,500 mAh	4,729 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	65 W	65 W
Charged in 30 min	103%	79%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.1	2
Video output	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.99 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 11	Android 10
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OxygenOS 14	—