- android.gs
- Compare
- 15T vs K15 Pro
OnePlus 15T vs OPPO K15 Pro
What 15T does better (17) and where K15 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
15TK15 Pro
| 15T | K15 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150.6 mm | 158.3 mm | −7.7 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 75.1 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 203 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 15T better than K15 Pro?
- AnTuTu score3,927,976 vs 2,254,164+74%
- Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 1,200 nits3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,033 vs 6,223+77%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · K15 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · K15 Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+35%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
Why is K15 Pro better than 15T?
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · 15T: Yes
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+4%
- Resolution (width)1,216 px vs 1,256 px+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 150.6 mm | 158.3 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Brown, Green, White | Gray, Silver, Pink, Black/Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,216 px | 1,256 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,760 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,094 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.6% | 88.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Super |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,927,976 | 2,254,164 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,033 | 6,223 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,500 mAh | 7,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 61% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 16 (Global) | ColorOS 16 |
