android.gs
Compare
13R vs Armor 29 Pro

OnePlus 13R vs UleFone Armor 29 Pro

What 13R does better (15) and where Armor 29 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

OnePlus · 202513R

9.3Score

15 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

UleFone · 2025Armor 29 Pro

9.1Score

7 advantages≈ $630

9.1Display8.6

8.6Camera7.3

8.5Battery9.7

8.8Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

13RArmor 29 Pro

	13R	Armor 29 Pro	Difference
Height	161.7 mm	177.4 mm	−15.7 mm
Width	75.8 mm	85.6 mm	−9.8 mm
Thickness	8 mm	33.8 mm	−25.8 mm
Weight	206 g	688 g	−482 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 13R better than Armor 29 Pro?

Weight206 g vs 688 g3.3×
Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,200 nits2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 29 Pro: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Armor 29 Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · Armor 29 Pro: No
Thickness8 mm vs 33.8 mm4.2×
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+27%
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
eSIMYes · Armor 29 Pro: No
Pixel density450 ppi vs 395 ppi+14%
Screen-to-body ratio91.2% vs 70.7%+29%
Charged in 30 min75% vs 60%+25%

Why is Armor 29 Pro better than 13R?

Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 21,200 mAh3.5×
Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · 13R: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 13R: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OnePlus 13R≈ $5809.3	UleFone Armor 29 Pro≈ $6309.1
Design
Weight	206 g	688 g
Thickness	8 mm	33.8 mm
Height	161.7 mm	177.4 mm
Width	75.8 mm	85.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Astral Trail, Nebula Noir	Black
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO 4.1 AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,264 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,780 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	450 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	2,200 nits
Measured brightness	1,223 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	91.2%	70.7%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 7400
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	2,109,299	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,803	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,979	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	21,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	15.2 h	—
Wired charging	80 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	75%	60%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-23.4 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	1.19 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OxygenOS 15	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—