- android.gs
- Compare
- 11 vs GT5 240W
OnePlus 11 vs Realme GT5 240W
What 11 does better (9) and where GT5 240W wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
11GT5 240W
| 11 | GT5 240W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 163.1 mm | = |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.4 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 11 better than GT5 240W?
- Telephoto cameraYes · GT5 240W: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- eSIMYes · GT5 240W: No
- Pixel density525 ppi vs 451 ppi+16%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,240 px+16%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.9 mm+5%
Why is GT5 240W better than 11?
- Wired charging100 W vs 240 W2.4×
- RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 1,024 GB8×
- Measured brightness767 nits vs 1,100 nits+43%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,400 nits+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Titan Black, Eternal Green, Jupiter Rock | Flowing Silver, Starry Oasis |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,216 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 525 ppi | 451 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 767 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,140,661 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,899 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,671 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 240 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 150% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.19 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 16 (International) | — |
