- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone vs Find X5
Nothing Phone vs OPPO Find X5
What Phone does better (1) and where Find X5 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PhoneFind X5
| Phone | Find X5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 160.3 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 72.6 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 196 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone better than Find X5?
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.7 mm+5%
Why is Find X5 better than Phone?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Phone: Yes
- NFCNo · Phone: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+7%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 30 W2×
- eSIMNo · Phone: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 94%+88%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 72.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Transparent | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 807 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 810,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,331 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,527 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 94% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS | ColorOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
