- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone Pro vs Camon 50 Ultra
Nothing Phone Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What Phone Pro does better (4) and where Camon 50 Ultra wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.5
9.2Camera9.1
7.7Battery8.5
8.5Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone ProCamon 50 Ultra
| Phone Pro | Camon 50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 162.4 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 77 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone Pro better than Camon 50 Ultra?
- Wired charging50 W vs 45 W+11%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Pixel density441 ppi vs 429 ppi+3%
Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than Phone Pro?
- Battery capacity5,080 mAh vs 6,160 mAh+21%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Weight210 g vs 178 g+18%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | — | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,302 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 804,875 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,134 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,050 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,080 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16 h |
| Wired charging | 50 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 4.1 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
