- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone Lite vs Poco M7
Nothing Phone Lite vs Xiaomi Poco M7
What Phone Lite does better (17) and where Poco M7 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display5.9
5.8Camera4.6
6.0Battery6.3
6.3Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone LitePoco M7
| Phone Lite | Poco M7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 171.9 mm | −7.9 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 205 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone Lite better than Poco M7?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 600 nits5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- OLED panelYes · Poco M7: No
- NFCYes · Poco M7: No
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 2+50%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 260 ppi+49%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M7: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
Why is Poco M7 better than Phone Lite?
- Stereo speakersNo · Phone Lite: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Phone Lite: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | — | Ocean Blue, Satin Black, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 539,456 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,115 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 3.5 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 53 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
