- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone Lite vs iQOO Z10R (India)
Nothing Phone Lite vs Vivo iQOO Z10R (India)
What Phone Lite does better (6) and where iQOO Z10R (India) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display8.2
5.8Camera7.8
6.0Battery8.0
6.3Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone LiteiQOO Z10R (India)
| Phone Lite | iQOO Z10R (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 163.3 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 76.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone Lite better than iQOO Z10R (India)?
- NFCYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits+67%
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 2+50%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
Why is iQOO Z10R (India) better than Phone Lite?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Phone Lite: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Phone Lite: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+14%
- Wired charging33 W vs 44 W+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Phone Lite: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 184 g+8%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | — | Aquamarine, Moonstone |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 911,502 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 3.5 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 53 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
