- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone (4b) vs Armor 22 Pro
Nothing Phone (4b) vs UleFone Armor 22 Pro
What Phone (4b) does better (17) and where Armor 22 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display5.4
8.1Camera5.4
7.5Battery8.2
6.9Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone (4b)Armor 22 Pro
| Phone (4b) | Armor 22 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 176.8 mm | −12.4 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 84.9 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 15 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 324 g | −114 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone (4b) better than Armor 22 Pro?
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 450 nits4.4×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- Weight210 g vs 324 g+54%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 15 mm+74%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
Why is Armor 22 Pro better than Phone (4b)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Memory card slotNo · Phone (4b): Yes
- eSIMNo · Phone (4b): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Phone (4b): Yes
- Pixel density381 ppi vs 401 ppi+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 324 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 176.8 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 84.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Dragontail Pro Glass | — |
| Colours | White, Black, Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,344 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 381 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.4% | 69.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 833,247 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,148 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 4.1 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 73 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
