- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone (3a) Pro vs RugOne Xever 7
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro vs UleFone RugOne Xever 7
What Phone (3a) Pro does better (9) and where RugOne Xever 7 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display7.2
9.1Camera7.3
7.5Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone (3a) ProRugOne Xever 7
| Phone (3a) Pro | RugOne Xever 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 173.6 mm | −10.1 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 84.4 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 14.1 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 325 g | −114 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone (3a) Pro better than RugOne Xever 7?
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 500 nits6×
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 7: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · RugOne Xever 7: No
- Weight211 g vs 325 g+54%
- eSIMYes · RugOne Xever 7: No
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 14.1 mm+68%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is RugOne Xever 7 better than Phone (3a) Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,550 mAh+11%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Energy classC vs A
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 395 ppi+2%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 325 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 14.1 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 173.6 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,307 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 820,097 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,327 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,061 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 13.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 50 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 4.0 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 43 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
