- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone (3a) Lite vs 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs TCL 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G
What Phone (3a) Lite does better (8) and where 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display5.4
6.7Battery6.4
6.4Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone (3a) Lite60 SE NXTPAPER 5G
| Phone (3a) Lite | 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 165.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 76.2 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone (3a) Lite better than 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 550 nits5.5×
- OLED panelYes · 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G: No
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 263 ppi+48%
- Energy classA vs B
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is 60 SE NXTPAPER 5G better than Phone (3a) Lite?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 165.6 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | — |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,228 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 691,743 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,996 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 853 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.98 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 3.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 54 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
