- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone (3a) Lite vs C62 Pro
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Oukitel C62 Pro
What Phone (3a) Lite does better (22) and where C62 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display4.6
6.8Camera2.7
6.7Battery5.1
6.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone (3a) LiteC62 Pro
| Phone (3a) Lite | C62 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 170.7 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 79.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone (3a) Lite better than C62 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Wired charging33 W vs 10 W3.3×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 450 nits6.7×
- OLED panelYes · C62 Pro: No
- 5GYes · C62 Pro: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+56%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 260 ppi+49%
- Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 5 MP3.2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · C62 Pro: No
Why is C62 Pro better than Phone (3a) Lite?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,150 mAh+3%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Drop resistance classC vs A
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 170.7 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | HKC Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | Gold, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,228 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 82.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 691,743 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,996 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 853 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.98 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 3.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 54 h | 48 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | C | A |
