- android.gs
- Compare
- Phone (1) vs A96
Nothing Phone (1) vs OPPO A96
What Phone (1) does better (17) and where A96 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone (1)A96
| Phone (1) | A96 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.4 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 191 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone (1) better than A96?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,024 vs 1,2152.5×
- AnTuTu score592,789 vs 430,045+38%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · A96: No
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 600 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · A96: No
- Wireless chargingYes · A96: No
- 5GYes · A96: No
- Stereo speakersYes · A96: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · A96: No
Why is A96 better than Phone (1)?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- Memory card slotNo · Phone (1): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Phone (1): Yes
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 58%+16%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP5X |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | White, Black | Starry Black, Sunset Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 663 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | 84% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 592,789 | 430,045 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,024 | 1,215 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Nothing OS 3.0 | ColorOS 11.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
