- android.gs
- Compare
- XR20 vs Galaxy F62
Nokia XR20 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
What XR20 does better (5) and where Galaxy F62 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display5.2
5.3Camera7.5
4.2Battery8.0
8.9Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
XR20Galaxy F62
| XR20 | Galaxy F62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.6 mm | 163.9 mm | +7.7 mm |
| Width | 81.5 mm | 76.3 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 10.6 mm | 9.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 248 g | 218 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XR20 better than Galaxy F62?
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy F62: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F62: No
- Peak brightness550 nits vs 420 nits+31%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Galaxy F62 better than XR20?
- Battery capacity4,630 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+51%
- OLED panelNo · XR20: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+36%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · XR20: Yes
- Weight248 g vs 218 g+14%
- Process8 nm vs 7 nm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 248 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 10.6 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 171.6 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 81.5 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 550 nits | 420 nits |
| Measured brightness | 595 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 76.8% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | 495,104 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,767 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 292 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.25" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,630 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.13 W/kg | 0.74 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
