- android.gs
- Compare
- G300 vs Redmi 9A Sport
Nokia G300 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport
What G300 does better (13) and where Redmi 9A Sport wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Display2.4
5.2Camera2.7
3.0Battery3.5
7.1Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
G300Redmi 9A Sport
| G300 | Redmi 9A Sport | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.4 mm | 164.9 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 77.1 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 194 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G300 better than Redmi 9A Sport?
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- 5GYes · Redmi 9A Sport: No
- NFCYes · Redmi 9A Sport: No
- RAM4 GB vs 3 GB+33%
- Main camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi 9A Sport: No
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Redmi 9A Sport better than G300?
- Battery capacity4,470 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+12%
- Dual SIMNo · G300: Yes
- Weight210 g vs 194 g+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio77.3% vs 81%+5%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 9 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 169.4 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Colours | Meteor Grey | Carbon Black, Coral Green, Metallic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.3% | 81% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,470 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 1.44 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12 |
