- android.gs
- Compare
- C2 Tava vs Redmi 9C NFC
Nokia C2 Tava vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C NFC
What C2 Tava does better (3) and where Redmi 9C NFC wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Display2.4
2.3Camera2.7
2.1Battery3.5
2.4Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
C2 TavaRedmi 9C NFC
| C2 Tava | Redmi 9C NFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150.6 mm | 164.9 mm | −14.3 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 77.1 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 196 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C2 Tava better than Redmi 9C NFC?
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Pixel density295 ppi vs 269 ppi+10%
- Weight180 g vs 196 g+9%
Why is Redmi 9C NFC better than C2 Tava?
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+67%
- RAM2 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Main camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- NFCNo · C2 Tava: Yes
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Storage (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · C2 Tava: Yes
- Screen size5.4″ vs 6.5″+20%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Process16 nm vs 12 nm+33%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 150.6 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Tempered Blue | Midnight Gray, Sunshine Yellow, Twilight Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,440 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 295 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.3% | 81% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Rear |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12 |
