How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Signature vs Aquos R9 pro

Motorola Signature vs Sharp Aquos R9 pro

What Signature does better (18) and where Aquos R9 pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Signature
Motorola · 2026Signature
9.6Score
18 advantages≈ $1,050
Higher score
vs
Sharp Aquos R9 pro
Sharp · 2025Aquos R9 pro
8.8Score
5 advantages≈ $1,100
9.6Display9.3
9.5Camera9.3
9.1Battery6.4
9.8Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

SignatureAquos R9 pro
76.4 × 162.1778 × 1629.3
SignatureAquos R9 proDifference
Height162.1 mm162 mm+0.1 mm
Width76.4 mm78 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness7 mm9.3 mm−2.3 mm
Weight186 g220 g−34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Signature better than Aquos R9 pro?

  1. Wired charging90 W vs 32 W2.8×
  2. Peak brightness6,200 nits vs 2,000 nits3.1×
  3. Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
  4. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  6. Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
  7. Wireless charging power50 W vs 15 W3.3×
  8. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
  9. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz+27%
  10. Max video8K vs 4K
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R9 pro: No
  12. Weight186 g vs 220 g+18%

Why is Aquos R9 pro better than Signature?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
  2. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Pixel density446 ppi vs 513 ppi+15%
  4. Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,440 px+14%
  5. USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola SignatureMotorola Signature≈ $1,0509.6
Sharp Aquos R9 proSharp Aquos R9 pro≈ $1,1008.8
Design
Weight186 g220 g
Thickness7 mm9.3 mm
Height162.1 mm162 mm
Width76.4 mm78 mm
FrameAluminium—
Ingress protectionIP68IP66
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx6
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Carbon, Martini OliveBlack
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDPRO IGZO LTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,264 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,780 px3,120 px
Pixel density446 ppi513 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz
Peak brightness6,200 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,518 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio92%87.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 735
AnTuTu score2,381,753—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,755—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,589—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/0.98"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×2.8×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,200 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)16.2 h—
Wired charging90 W32 W
Charged in 30 min100%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 Gen2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-22.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised73
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle52 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare