android.gs
Compare
Signature 27 vs X200T

Motorola Signature 27 vs Vivo X200T

What Signature 27 does better (18) and where X200T wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2026Signature 27

9.7Score

18 advantages

Higher score

Vivo · 2026X200T

9.6Score

3 advantages≈ $590

9.6Display9.3

9.8Performance9.0

9.8Camera9.3

9.7Battery9.5

9.4Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Signature 27X200T

	Signature 27	X200T	Difference
Height	162.1 mm	160 mm	+2.1 mm
Width	76.4 mm	74.3 mm	+2.1 mm
Thickness	7.2 mm	8 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	191 g	203 g	−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Signature 27 better than X200T?

AnTuTu score5,153,294 vs 2,725,989+89%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)12,703 vs 8,430+51%
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+13%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Optical zoom5× vs 3×+67%
Major OS updates promised7 vs 5+40%
CPU frequency5.01 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+38%
Peak brightness6,200 nits vs 5,000 nits+24%
Max video8K vs 4K
Weight191 g vs 203 g+6%

Why is X200T better than Signature 27?

eSIMNo · Signature 27: Yes
Pixel density449 ppi vs 460 ppi+2%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Signature 279.7	Vivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight	191 g	203 g
Thickness	7.2 mm	8 mm
Height	162.1 mm	160 mm
Width	76.4 mm	74.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2	Schott Xensation Core
Colours	Pantone: Coal Smoke, Capulet Olive	Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,264 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,780 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	449 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	6,200 nits	5,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.2%	90.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6	Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	2 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	5.01 GHz	3.63 GHz
GPU	Adreno 850	Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score	5,153,294	2,725,989
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	12,703	8,430
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.28"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	5×	3×
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,000 mAh	6,200 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Wired charging	90 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	70%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	40 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.1	2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Ultra Wideband	Yes	—
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	1.09 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 17	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised	7	5