- android.gs
- Compare
- S50 Neo vs Galaxy A55
Motorola S50 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What S50 Neo does better (7) and where Galaxy A55 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display7.4
8.2Camera8.3
5.5Battery5.0
6.5Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
S50 NeoGalaxy A55
| S50 Neo | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 161.1 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 77.4 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 213 g | −42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S50 Neo better than Galaxy A55?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,000 nits+60%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Weight171 g vs 213 g+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.6% vs 85.8%+7%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than S50 Neo?
- Stereo speakersNo · S50 Neo: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+25%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · S50 Neo: Yes
- eSIMNo · S50 Neo: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Olivine, Surf, Gray | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.6% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2. | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
