- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr Ultra 2026 vs Mix Flip 2
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
What Razr Ultra 2026 does better (8) and where Mix Flip 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.4
8.8Camera7.1
8.6Battery9.2
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr Ultra 2026Mix Flip 2
| Razr Ultra 2026 | Mix Flip 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 166.9 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 73.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr Ultra 2026 better than Mix Flip 2?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMYes · Mix Flip 2: No
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+3%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+6%
Why is Mix Flip 2 better than Razr Ultra 2026?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,165 mAh+3%
- Wireless charging power30 W vs 50 W+67%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 166.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Ceramic | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Orient Blue, Cocoa | White, Purple, Green, Checkered Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,992 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,424 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 88.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,379,591 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,889 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,165 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
