How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2026 vs Mix Flip

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip

What Razr Ultra 2026 does better (15) and where Mix Flip wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Motorola · 2026Razr Ultra 2026
9.6Score
15 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip
8.1Score
4 advantages≈ $720
9.7Display7.7
9.5Performance7.4
8.8Camera6.4
8.6Battery7.0
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2026Mix Flip
74 × 171.57.274 × 167.57.6
Razr Ultra 2026Mix FlipDifference
Height171.5 mm167.5 mm+4 mm
Width74 mm74 mm=
Thickness7.2 mm7.6 mm−0.4 mm
Weight199 g190 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2026 better than Mix Flip?

  1. AnTuTu score3,379,591 vs 1,609,5702.1×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,889 vs 6,035+47%
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Mix Flip: No
  4. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  5. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,780 mAh+5%
  6. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+67%
  7. CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+35%
  8. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
  10. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  11. eSIMYes · Mix Flip: No
  12. Measured brightness1,424 nits vs 1,314 nits+8%

Why is Mix Flip better than Razr Ultra 2026?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr Ultra 2026: Yes
  3. Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
  4. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Mix FlipXiaomi Mix Flip≈ $7208.1
Design
Weight199 g190 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.6 mm
Height171.5 mm167.5 mm
Width74 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Ceramic—
ColoursPantone: Orient Blue, CocoaBlack, White, Purple
Display
Screen size7″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,992 px2,912 px
Pixel density462 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,424 nits1,314 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.3%87.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.47 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 750
AnTuTu score3,379,5911,609,570
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,8896,035
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,209
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh4,780 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)—12 h
Wired charging68 W67 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare