How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2026 vs X Fold3

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo X Fold3

What Razr Ultra 2026 does better (12) and where X Fold3 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Motorola · 2026Razr Ultra 2026
9.6Score
12 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
vs
Vivo X Fold3
Vivo · 2024X Fold3
8.8Score
10 advantages≈ $970
9.7Display9.4
8.8Camera7.4
8.6Battery8.8
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2026X Fold3
74 × 171.57.2142.7 × 1604.7
Razr Ultra 2026X Fold3Difference
Height171.5 mm160 mm+11.5 mm
Width74 mm142.7 mm−68.7 mm
Thickness7.2 mm4.7 mm+2.5 mm
Weight199 g219 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2026 better than X Fold3?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · X Fold3: No
  2. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  3. CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+40%
  4. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold3: No
  7. eSIMYes · X Fold3: No
  8. Pixel density462 ppi vs 413 ppi+12%
  9. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+11%
  10. Weight199 g vs 219 g+10%
  11. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  12. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%

Why is X Fold3 better than Razr Ultra 2026?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr Ultra 2026: Yes
  3. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
  4. Wired charging68 W vs 80 W+18%
  5. Screen size7″ vs 8″+15%
  6. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,200 px+80%
  7. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  8. Thickness7.2 mm vs 4.7 mm+53%
  9. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio87.3% vs 90.5%+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026Motorola Razr Ultra 2026≈ $7509.6
Vivo X Fold3Vivo X Fold3≈ $9708.8
Design
Weight199 g219 g
Thickness7.2 mm4.7 mm
Height171.5 mm160 mm
Width74 mm142.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Ceramic—
ColoursPantone: Orient Blue, CocoaBlack, White
Display
Screen size7″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,992 px2,480 px
Pixel density462 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness1,424 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.3%90.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.47 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 740
AnTuTu score3,379,591—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,889—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Wired charging68 W80 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—OriginOS 4

Related comparisons

Honor Magic V3vsVivo X Fold3Honor Magic V3vsVivo X Fold38.28.8
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare