How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2025 vs Mix Flip

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip

What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (11) and where Mix Flip wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025
9.0Score
11 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip
8.1Score
4 advantages≈ $720
9.6Display7.7
8.8Camera6.4
8.0Battery7.0
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2025Mix Flip
74 × 171.57.274 × 167.57.6
Razr Ultra 2025Mix FlipDifference
Height171.5 mm167.5 mm+4 mm
Width74 mm74 mm=
Thickness7.2 mm7.6 mm−0.4 mm
Weight199 g190 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Mix Flip?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · Mix Flip: No
  2. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  3. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
  4. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+31%
  5. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
  7. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  8. eSIMYes · Mix Flip: No
  9. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  10. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
  11. Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+6%

Why is Mix Flip better than Razr Ultra 2025?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr Ultra 2025: Yes
  2. Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
  3. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 87.5%+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Mix FlipXiaomi Mix Flip≈ $7208.1
Design
Weight199 g190 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.6 mm
Height171.5 mm167.5 mm
Width74 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretBlack, White, Purple
Display
Screen size7″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,912 px
Pixel density464 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,314 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%87.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 750
AnTuTu score—1,609,570
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,035
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,209
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,780 mAh
Active use (test)—12 h
Wired charging68 W67 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare