How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2025 vs X Fold5

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Vivo X Fold5

What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (10) and where X Fold5 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025
9.0Score
10 advantages≈ $600
vs
Vivo X Fold5
Vivo · 2025X Fold5
9.0Score
10 advantages≈ $920
Higher score
9.6Display9.4
8.8Camera8.7
8.0Battery9.3
8.4Features6.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2025X Fold5
74 × 171.57.2142.3 × 159.74.3
Razr Ultra 2025X Fold5Difference
Height171.5 mm159.7 mm+11.8 mm
Width74 mm142.3 mm−68.3 mm
Thickness7.2 mm4.3 mm+2.9 mm
Weight199 g217 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than X Fold5?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  2. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  3. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+31%
  4. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold5: No
  7. eSIMYes · X Fold5: No
  8. Pixel density464 ppi vs 413 ppi+12%
  9. Weight199 g vs 217 g+9%
  10. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%

Why is X Fold5 better than Razr Ultra 2025?

  1. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+28%
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr Ultra 2025: Yes
  3. Wired charging68 W vs 80 W+18%
  4. Screen size7″ vs 8″+15%
  5. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,200 px+80%
  6. Thickness7.2 mm vs 4.3 mm+67%
  7. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  8. Wireless charging power30 W vs 40 W+33%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 90.9%+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold5Vivo X Fold5≈ $9209.0
Design
Weight199 g217 g
Thickness7.2 mm4.3 mm
Height171.5 mm159.7 mm
Width74 mm142.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerPlastic
Ingress protectionIP48IP58
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretTitanium Gray, Green, White
Display
Screen size7″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,480 px
Pixel density464 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,916 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%90.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 750
AnTuTu score—1,883,303
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,483
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,739
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—13.3 h
Wired charging68 W80 W
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare