- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr Ultra 2025 vs X Fold3
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Vivo X Fold3
What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (11) and where X Fold3 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.4
8.8Camera7.4
8.0Battery8.8
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr Ultra 2025X Fold3
| Razr Ultra 2025 | X Fold3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 160 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 142.7 mm | −68.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 4.7 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than X Fold3?
- Wireless chargingYes · X Fold3: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold3: No
- eSIMYes · X Fold3: No
- Pixel density464 ppi vs 413 ppi+12%
- Weight199 g vs 219 g+10%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
Why is X Fold3 better than Razr Ultra 2025?
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr Ultra 2025: Yes
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+17%
- Wired charging68 W vs 80 W+18%
- Screen size7″ vs 8″+15%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,200 px+80%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 4.7 mm+53%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 90.5%+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 4.7 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 142.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 2,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 90.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| USB version | — | 3.2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 4 |
