- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr Ultra 2025 vs Phantom V Flip
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip
What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (21) and where Phantom V Flip wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display3.8
8.8Camera3.9
8.0Battery3.6
8.4Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr Ultra 2025Phantom V Flip
| Razr Ultra 2025 | Phantom V Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 194 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Phantom V Flip?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits4.5×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Wired charging68 W vs 45 W+51%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom V Flip: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Phantom V Flip: No
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3 GHz+44%
- Process3 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Why is Phantom V Flip better than Razr Ultra 2025?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Weight199 g vs 194 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.7 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 565,851 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,805 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
