How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2025 vs Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (17) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025
9.0Score
17 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $530
9.6Display5.8
8.8Camera4.0
8.0Battery3.0
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
74 × 171.57.271.9 × 165.16.9
Razr Ultra 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FEDifference
Height171.5 mm165.1 mm+6.4 mm
Width74 mm71.9 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness7.2 mm6.9 mm+0.3 mm
Weight199 g187 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

  1. Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
  2. RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  4. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
  5. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  6. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
  7. Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
  8. Selfie camera50 MP vs 10 MP5×
  9. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
  10. Max video8K vs 4K
  11. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  12. Wireless charging power30 W vs 15 W2×

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than Razr Ultra 2025?

  1. Weight199 g vs 187 g+6%
  2. CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
  3. Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.9 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g187 g
Thickness7.2 mm6.9 mm
Height171.5 mm165.1 mm
Width74 mm71.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretBlack, White
Display
Screen size7″6.7″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,640 px
Pixel density464 ppi426 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,444 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%85.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteExynos 2400
Chip makerQualcommExynos
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score—1,355,845
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,108
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,036
Memory
RAM16 GB8 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—10.2 h
Wired charging68 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.84 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 8
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,700
Endurance per cycle—37 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare