- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr+ 2026 vs Nubia Fold
Motorola Razr+ 2026 vs ZTE Nubia Fold
What Razr+ 2026 does better (5) and where Nubia Fold wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.8
4.7Camera6.7
5.8Battery8.1
8.4Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr+ 2026Nubia Fold
| Razr+ 2026 | Nubia Fold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 160 mm | +11.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 144 mm | −70 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 5.4 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 249 g | −60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr+ 2026 better than Nubia Fold?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wireless chargingYes · Nubia Fold: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Weight189 g vs 249 g+32%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Nubia Fold better than Razr+ 2026?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,560 mAh+46%
- Wired charging45 W vs 55 W+22%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+44%
- Resolution (width)1,084 px vs 2,200 px2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Screen size6.9″ vs 8″+16%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 5.4 mm+31%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.1% vs 89%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 5.4 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 144 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Pantone: Mountain View | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,084 px | 2,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 414 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,846,775 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,001 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,560 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 55 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
