- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr+ 2026 vs nubia Flip3
Motorola Razr+ 2026 vs ZTE nubia Flip3
What Razr+ 2026 does better (11) and where nubia Flip3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.0
4.7Camera3.8
5.8Battery5.1
8.4Features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr+ 2026nubia Flip3
| Razr+ 2026 | nubia Flip3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 170 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr+ 2026 better than nubia Flip3?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Flip3: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia Flip3: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Flip3: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+15%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+6%
Why is nubia Flip3 better than Razr+ 2026?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,610 mAh+2%
- Pixel density414 ppi vs 439 ppi+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
- Resolution (width)1,084 px vs 1,188 px+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Pantone: Mountain View | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,084 px | 1,188 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,790 px |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 85.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,846,775 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,001 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,610 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
