- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr+ 2026 vs Galaxy Z Fold7
Motorola Razr+ 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What Razr+ 2026 does better (7) and where Galaxy Z Fold7 wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display5.7
6.7Performance8.6
4.7Camera9.0
5.8Battery4.4
8.4Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr+ 2026Galaxy Z Fold7
| Razr+ 2026 | Galaxy Z Fold7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 158.4 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 143.2 mm | −69.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 4.2 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 215 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr+ 2026 better than Galaxy Z Fold7?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+2%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+15%
- Weight189 g vs 215 g+14%
- Pixel density414 ppi vs 368 ppi+12%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold7 better than Razr+ 2026?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,001 vs 9,152+83%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr+ 2026: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- AnTuTu score1,846,775 vs 1,995,132+8%
- Optical zoom2× vs 3×+50%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+49%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Screen size6.9″ vs 8″+16%
- Resolution (width)1,084 px vs 1,968 px+82%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 4.2 mm+69%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 4.2 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 158.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 143.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Mountain View | Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet Black, Mint |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,084 px | 1,968 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,184 px |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 368 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,408 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,846,775 | 1,995,132 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,001 | 9,152 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.7 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.42 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 40 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.88.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold68.17.3
vsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.58.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold58.16.8
vsHonor Magic V Flip 2vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.98.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsZTE Nubia Fold8.18.2