How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr+ 2026 vs Galaxy Z Flip8

Motorola Razr+ 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

What Razr+ 2026 does better (5) and where Galaxy Z Flip8 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr+ 2026
Motorola · 2026Razr+ 2026
7.7Score
5 advantages≈ $1,100
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Flip8
7.8Score
8 advantages≈ $900
Higher score
9.2Display6.4
6.7Performance8.2
4.7Camera4.9
5.8Battery5.7
8.4Features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr+ 2026Galaxy Z Flip8
74 × 171.47.175.4 × 166.96.1
Razr+ 2026Galaxy Z Flip8Difference
Height171.4 mm166.9 mm+4.5 mm
Width74 mm75.4 mm−1.4 mm
Thickness7.1 mm6.1 mm+1 mm
Weight189 g180 g+9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr+ 2026 better than Galaxy Z Flip8?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
  2. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  3. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+5%
  4. Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
  5. Pixel density414 ppi vs 400 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip8 better than Razr+ 2026?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,001 vs 10,4662.1×
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+58%
  4. Weight189 g vs 180 g+5%
  5. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  6. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  7. Thickness7.1 mm vs 6.1 mm+16%
  8. Screen-to-body ratio85.1% vs 87.1%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr+ 2026Motorola Razr+ 2026≈ $1,1007.7
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8≈ $9007.8
Design
Weight189 g180 g
Thickness7.1 mm6.1 mm
Height171.4 mm166.9 mm
Width74 mm75.4 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursPantone: Mountain ViewGraphite, Cream, Pink, Mint
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,084 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,520 px
Pixel density414 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,470 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.1%87.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz4.74 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW
AnTuTu score1,846,7751,821,743
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,00110,466
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,916
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh4,300 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—14.2 h
Wired charging45 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—55%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.74 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—44 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare