How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr+ 2025 vs Mix Flip 2

Motorola Razr+ 2025 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

What Razr+ 2025 does better (5) and where Mix Flip 2 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr+ 2025
Motorola · 2025Razr+ 2025
7.1Score
5 advantages≈ $380
vs
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Xiaomi · 2025Mix Flip 2
8.7Score
13 advantages≈ $780
Higher score
9.1Display8.4
5.7Camera7.1
3.8Battery9.2
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr+ 2025Mix Flip 2
74 × 171.47.173.8 × 166.97.6
Razr+ 2025Mix Flip 2Difference
Height171.4 mm166.9 mm+4.5 mm
Width74 mm73.8 mm+0.2 mm
Thickness7.1 mm7.6 mm−0.5 mm
Weight189 g199 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr+ 2025 better than Mix Flip 2?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Mix Flip 2: No
  2. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  3. eSIMYes · Mix Flip 2: No
  4. Weight189 g vs 199 g+5%
  5. Thickness7.1 mm vs 7.6 mm+7%

Why is Mix Flip 2 better than Razr+ 2025?

  1. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  2. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,165 mAh+29%
  3. Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
  4. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  5. Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
  6. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+44%
  7. Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr+ 2025: Yes
  8. Max video4K vs 8K
  9. Pixel density413 ppi vs 460 ppi+11%
  10. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+7%
  11. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  12. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight189 g199 g
Thickness7.1 mm7.6 mm
Height171.4 mm166.9 mm
Width74 mm73.8 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursPantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot PinkWhite, Purple, Green, Checkered Gold
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,912 px
Pixel density413 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness1,220 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%88.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 830
AnTuTu score1,794,400—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,989—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,000 mAh5,165 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)10.6 h—
Wired charging45 W67 W
Charged in 30 min73%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIHyperOS 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare