android.gs
Compare
Razr Fold vs 18 Fold

Motorola Razr Fold vs Xiaomi 18 Fold

What Razr Fold does better (10) and where 18 Fold wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2026Razr Fold

9.7Score

10 advantages≈ $2,250

Higher score

Xiaomi · 202618 Fold

9.5Score

6 advantages≈ $1,500

9.5Display7.7

9.2Performance9.8

9.1Camera9.2

9.7Battery9.4

9.6Features7.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Fold18 Fold

	Razr Fold	18 Fold	Difference
Height	160.1 mm	163.8 mm	−3.7 mm
Width	144.5 mm	117.8 mm	+26.7 mm
Thickness	4.7 mm	5 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	243 g	219 g	+24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Fold better than 18 Fold?

Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
Peak brightness6,200 nits vs 4,000 nits+55%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
4K selfie videoYes · 18 Fold: No
eSIMYes · 18 Fold: No
Pixel density410 ppi vs 382 ppi+7%
Screen size8.1″ vs 7.6″+7%
Resolution (width)2,232 px vs 1,672 px+33%
Thickness4.7 mm vs 5 mm+6%
Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%

Why is 18 Fold better than Razr Fold?

AnTuTu score2,342,132 vs 5,228,0142.2×
Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,804 vs 13,491+53%
CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 4.35 GHz+14%
Weight243 g vs 219 g+11%
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr Fold≈ $2,2509.7	Xiaomi 18 Fold≈ $1,5009.5
Design
Weight	243 g	219 g
Thickness	4.7 mm	5 mm
Height	160.1 mm	163.8 mm
Width	144.5 mm	117.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Glass
Ingress protection	IP48	IP58
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass-Keramik	Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3
Colours	Pantone: Blackened Blue, Lily White	Gray, Silver, Red, Rose gold
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	8.1″	7.6″
Panel	Foldable LTPO P-OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	2,232 px	1,672 px
Resolution (height)	2,484 px	2,364 px
Pixel density	410 ppi	382 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	6,200 nits	4,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,510 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	91.9%	90.6%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5	XRing O3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Xring
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	3.8 GHz	4.35 GHz
GPU	Adreno 829	Arm G2-Ultra NX MC16
AnTuTu score	2,342,132	5,228,014
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	8,804	13,491
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,152	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.28"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	16.1 h	—
Wired charging	80 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Ultra Wideband	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-28.5 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 17
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 4
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	59 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	C	—

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsXiaomi 18 Fold8.89.5