How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Fold vs Galaxy Z TriFold

Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

What Razr Fold does better (11) and where Galaxy Z TriFold wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Fold
Motorola · 2026Razr Fold
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $2,250
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z TriFold
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $3,100
9.5Display5.0
9.2Performance9.4
9.1Camera9.0
9.7Battery7.9
9.6Features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr FoldGalaxy Z TriFold
144.5 × 160.14.7214.1 × 159.23.9
Razr FoldGalaxy Z TriFoldDifference
Height160.1 mm159.2 mm+0.9 mm
Width144.5 mm214.1 mm−69.6 mm
Thickness4.7 mm3.9 mm+0.8 mm
Weight243 g309 g−66 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Fold better than Galaxy Z TriFold?

  1. Peak brightness6,200 nits vs 1,600 nits3.9×
  2. Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
  3. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh+7%
  4. Pixel density410 ppi vs 269 ppi+52%
  5. Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
  6. Wireless charging power50 W vs 15 W3.3×
  7. Weight243 g vs 309 g+27%
  8. Resolution (width)2,232 px vs 1,584 px+41%
  9. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  10. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio91.9% vs 89.6%+3%

Why is Galaxy Z TriFold better than Razr Fold?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  2. AnTuTu score2,342,132 vs 2,926,532+25%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,804 vs 9,710+10%
  4. Screen size8.1″ vs 10″+23%
  5. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  6. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+18%
  7. Thickness4.7 mm vs 3.9 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr FoldMotorola Razr Fold≈ $2,2509.7
Design
Weight243 g309 g
Thickness4.7 mm3.9 mm
Height160.1 mm159.2 mm
Width144.5 mm214.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass-KeramikCorning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
ColoursPantone: Blackened Blue, Lily WhiteCrafted Black
StylusYes—
Display
Screen size8.1″10″
PanelFoldable LTPO P-OLEDTri-foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,232 px1,584 px
Resolution (height)2,484 px2,160 px
Pixel density410 ppi269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness6,200 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness1,510 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio91.9%89.6%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,342,1322,926,532
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,8049,710
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,152—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.3"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh5,600 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Ion
Active use (test)16.1 h—
Wired charging80 W45 W
Charged in 30 min50%50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-28.5 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1.18 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle59 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare