How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Fold vs Signature 27

Motorola Razr Fold vs Motorola Signature 27

What Razr Fold does better (6) and where Signature 27 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Fold
Motorola · 2026Razr Fold
9.7Score
6 advantages≈ $2,250
vs
Motorola Signature 27
Motorola · 2026Signature 27
9.7Score
11 advantages
Higher score
9.5Display9.6
9.2Performance9.8
9.1Camera9.8
9.7Battery9.7
9.6Features9.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr FoldSignature 27
144.5 × 160.14.776.4 × 162.17.2
Razr FoldSignature 27Difference
Height160.1 mm162.1 mm−2 mm
Width144.5 mm76.4 mm+68.1 mm
Thickness4.7 mm7.2 mm−2.5 mm
Weight243 g191 g+52 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Fold better than Signature 27?

  1. eSIMYes · Signature 27: No
  2. Screen size8.1″ vs 6.8″+19%
  3. Resolution (width)2,232 px vs 1,264 px+77%
  4. Thickness4.7 mm vs 7.2 mm+53%
  5. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  6. USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%

Why is Signature 27 better than Razr Fold?

  1. AnTuTu score2,342,132 vs 5,153,2942.2×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,804 vs 12,703+44%
  3. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  5. Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
  6. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  7. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 5.01 GHz+32%
  8. Weight243 g vs 191 g+27%
  9. Pixel density410 ppi vs 449 ppi+10%
  10. Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
  11. Process3 nm vs 2 nm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr FoldMotorola Razr Fold≈ $2,2509.7
Design
Weight243 g191 g
Thickness4.7 mm7.2 mm
Height160.1 mm162.1 mm
Width144.5 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIP48IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass-KeramikCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Blackened Blue, Lily WhitePantone: Coal Smoke, Capulet Olive
StylusYes—
Display
Screen size8.1″6.8″
PanelFoldable LTPO P-OLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,232 px1,264 px
Resolution (height)2,484 px2,780 px
Pixel density410 ppi449 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness6,200 nits6,200 nits
Measured brightness1,510 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio91.9%90.2%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm2 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz5.01 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 850
AnTuTu score2,342,1325,153,294
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,80412,703
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,152—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.28"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh7,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)16.1 h—
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min50%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth66
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYesYes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-28.5 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised77
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle59 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare