How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70 vs Mix Flip 2

Motorola Razr 70 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip 2

What Razr 70 does better (3) and where Mix Flip 2 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70
Motorola · 2026Razr 70
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $910
vs
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
Xiaomi · 2025Mix Flip 2
8.7Score
15 advantages≈ $780
Higher score
7.2Display8.4
5.2Camera7.1
6.4Battery9.2
5.6Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70Mix Flip 2
74 × 171.37.373.8 × 166.97.6
Razr 70Mix Flip 2Difference
Height171.3 mm166.9 mm+4.4 mm
Width74 mm73.8 mm+0.2 mm
Thickness7.3 mm7.6 mm−0.3 mm
Weight188 g199 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70 better than Mix Flip 2?

  1. eSIMYes · Mix Flip 2: No
  2. Weight188 g vs 199 g+6%
  3. Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.6 mm+4%

Why is Mix Flip 2 better than Razr 70?

  1. Wired charging30 W vs 67 W2.2×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,165 mAh+8%
  5. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+66%
  6. Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. Max video4K vs 8K
  9. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  10. Pixel density413 ppi vs 460 ppi+11%
  11. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+7%
  12. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 70Motorola Razr 70≈ $9106.0
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Xiaomi Mix Flip 2≈ $7808.7
Design
Weight188 g199 g
Thickness7.3 mm7.6 mm
Height171.3 mm166.9 mm
Width74 mm73.8 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursPantone: Hematite, Sporting Green, Bright White, RoseWhite, Purple, Green, Checkered Gold
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,912 px
Pixel density413 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness1,522 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%88.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7450XQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 830
AnTuTu score756,392—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,250—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,061—
Memory
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,800 mAh5,165 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)13 h—
Wired charging30 W67 W
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W50 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle60 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—

Related comparisons

Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 2Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsXiaomi Mix Flip 2Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsXiaomi Mix Flip 28.58.7
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare