- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 70 vs Galaxy Z Fold7
Motorola Razr 70 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What Razr 70 does better (12) and where Galaxy Z Fold7 wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display5.7
3.1Performance8.6
5.2Camera9.0
6.4Battery4.4
5.6Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 70Galaxy Z Fold7
| Razr 70 | Galaxy Z Fold7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 158.4 mm | +12.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 143.2 mm | −69.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 4.2 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 70 better than Galaxy Z Fold7?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+9%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Active use (test)13 h vs 11.7 h+11%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
- Energy classA vs B
- Repairability classB vs C
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+15%
- Weight188 g vs 215 g+14%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 368 ppi+12%
- Measured brightness1,522 nits vs 1,408 nits+8%
- Endurance per cycle60 h vs 40 h+47%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.3 LUFS vs -28 LUFS+-13%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold7 better than Razr 70?
- AnTuTu score756,392 vs 1,995,1322.6×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,250 vs 9,1522.8×
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,061 vs 5,9525.6×
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 72.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 70: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+72%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 4.2 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 158.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 143.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Hematite, Sporting Green, Bright White, Rose | Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet Black, Mint |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,968 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,184 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 368 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,522 nits | 1,408 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7450X | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 756,392 | 1,995,132 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,250 | 9,152 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,061 | 5,952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 13 h | 11.7 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.3 LUFS | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.42 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 60 h | 40 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.88.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold68.17.3
vsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.58.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold58.16.8
vsHonor Magic V Flip 2vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold78.98.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7vsZTE Nubia Fold8.18.2