- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 70 vs Razr 70+
Motorola Razr 70 vs Motorola Razr 70+
What Razr 70 does better (4) and where Razr 70+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 70Razr 70+
| Razr 70 | Razr 70+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 171.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.1 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 70 better than Razr 70+?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Drop resistance classA vs B
- Endurance per cycle60 h vs 49 h+22%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Razr 70+ better than Razr 70?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.1 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Hematite, Sporting Green, Bright White, Rose | Pantone: Mountain View |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,084 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 414 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,522 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7450X | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 756,392 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,250 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,061 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 13 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 60 h | 49 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
