How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70 Ultra vs 18 Fold

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Xiaomi 18 Fold

What Razr 70 Ultra does better (10) and where 18 Fold wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola · 2026Razr 70 Ultra
9.4Score
10 advantages≈ $1,500
vs
Xiaomi 18 Fold
Xiaomi · 202618 Fold
9.5Score
16 advantages≈ $1,500
Higher score
9.7Display7.7
8.9Performance9.8
8.8Camera9.2
9.2Battery9.4
6.1Features7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70 Ultra18 Fold
74 × 171.57.2117.8 × 163.85
Razr 70 Ultra18 FoldDifference
Height171.5 mm163.8 mm+7.7 mm
Width74 mm117.8 mm−43.8 mm
Thickness7.2 mm5 mm+2.2 mm
Weight199 g219 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70 Ultra better than 18 Fold?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  2. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  3. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 4,000 nits+25%
  4. Pixel density462 ppi vs 382 ppi+21%
  5. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  7. 4K selfie videoYes · 18 Fold: No
  8. eSIMYes · 18 Fold: No
  9. Weight199 g vs 219 g+10%
  10. CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 4.35 GHz+3%

Why is 18 Fold better than Razr 70 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,256,591 vs 5,228,0142.3×
  2. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,651 vs 13,491+56%
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  5. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 70 Ultra: Yes
  6. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
  7. Screen size7″ vs 7.6″+8%
  8. Wireless charging power30 W vs 50 W+67%
  9. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  10. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  11. Thickness7.2 mm vs 5 mm+44%
  12. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,672 px+37%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi 18 FoldXiaomi 18 Fold≈ $1,5009.5
Design
Weight199 g219 g
Thickness7.2 mm5 mm
Height171.5 mm163.8 mm
Width74 mm117.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP48IP58
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass VictusXiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3
ColoursPantone: Orient Blue, CocoaGray, Silver, Red, Rose gold
Display
Screen size7″7.6″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,672 px
Resolution (height)2,992 px2,364 px
Pixel density462 ppi382 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits4,000 nits
Measured brightness1,486 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.3%90.6%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteXRing O3
Chip makerQualcommXring
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency4.47 GHz4.35 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Arm G2-Ultra NX MC16
AnTuTu score2,256,5915,228,014
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,65113,491
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,865—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)16.6 h—
Wired charging68 W67 W
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 4
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle51 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare