How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70 Ultra vs X Fold

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold

What Razr 70 Ultra does better (16) and where X Fold wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola · 2026Razr 70 Ultra
9.4Score
16 advantages≈ $1,500
Higher score
vs
Vivo X Fold
Vivo · 2022X Fold
8.0Score
7 advantages≈ $1,400
9.7Display6.0
8.8Camera9.6
9.2Battery7.7
6.1Features4.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70 UltraX Fold
74 × 171.57.2144.9 × 1626.3
Razr 70 UltraX FoldDifference
Height171.5 mm162 mm+9.5 mm
Width74 mm144.9 mm−70.9 mm
Thickness7.2 mm6.3 mm+0.9 mm
Weight199 g311 g−112 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70 Ultra better than X Fold?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  2. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  3. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
  4. Weight199 g vs 311 g+56%
  5. CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 3 GHz+49%
  6. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  7. Wired charging68 W vs 66 W+3%
  8. Pixel density462 ppi vs 360 ppi+28%
  9. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  10. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold: No
  12. eSIMYes · X Fold: No

Why is X Fold better than Razr 70 Ultra?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 70 Ultra: Yes
  2. Rear cameras2 vs 42×
  3. Screen size7″ vs 8″+15%
  4. Wireless charging power30 W vs 50 W+67%
  5. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  6. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,916 px+57%
  7. Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.3 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X FoldVivo X Fold≈ $1,4008.0
Design
Weight199 g311 g
Thickness7.2 mm6.3 mm
Height171.5 mm162 mm
Width74 mm144.9 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursPantone: Orient Blue, CocoaBlack, Blue
Display
Screen size7″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,916 px
Resolution (height)2,992 px2,160 px
Pixel density462 ppi360 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,486 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.3%88%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.47 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 730
AnTuTu score2,256,591—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,651—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,865—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.57"
Rear cameras24
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh4,600 mAh
Active use (test)16.6 h—
Wired charging68 W66 W
Charged in 30 min—81%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—OriginOS Ocean
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle51 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare