- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 70 Ultra vs Razr Ultra 2026
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
What Razr 70 Ultra does better (1) and where Razr Ultra 2026 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.7
8.9Performance9.5
8.8Camera8.8
9.2Battery8.6
6.1Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 70 UltraRazr Ultra 2026
| Razr 70 Ultra | Razr Ultra 2026 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.5 mm | = |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 70 Ultra better than Razr Ultra 2026?
- Measured brightness1,486 nits vs 1,424 nits+4%
Why is Razr Ultra 2026 better than Razr 70 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score2,256,591 vs 3,379,591+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,651 vs 8,889+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Ceramic |
| Colours | Pantone: Orient Blue, Cocoa | Pantone: Orient Blue, Cocoa |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,992 px | 2,992 px |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi | 462 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,486 nits | 1,424 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 87.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,256,591 | 3,379,591 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,651 | 8,889 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,865 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 16.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 68 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
