How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70 Ultra vs Razr+ 2026

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Motorola Razr+ 2026

What Razr 70 Ultra does better (17) and where Razr+ 2026 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Motorola · 2026Razr 70 Ultra
9.4Score
17 advantages≈ $1,500
Higher score
vs
Motorola Razr+ 2026
Motorola · 2026Razr+ 2026
7.7Score
1 advantage≈ $1,100
9.7Display9.2
8.9Performance6.7
8.8Camera4.7
9.2Battery5.8
6.1Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70 UltraRazr+ 2026
74 × 171.57.274 × 171.47.1
Razr 70 UltraRazr+ 2026Difference
Height171.5 mm171.4 mm+0.1 mm
Width74 mm74 mm=
Thickness7.2 mm7.1 mm+0.1 mm
Weight199 g189 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70 Ultra better than Razr+ 2026?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,651 vs 5,001+73%
  2. Wired charging68 W vs 45 W+51%
  3. AnTuTu score2,256,591 vs 1,846,775+22%
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
  6. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  7. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+67%
  8. CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 3 GHz+49%
  9. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  10. Max video8K vs 4K
  11. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  12. Wireless charging power30 W vs 15 W2×

Why is Razr+ 2026 better than Razr 70 Ultra?

  1. Weight199 g vs 189 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 70 UltraMotorola Razr 70 Ultra≈ $1,5009.4
Motorola Razr+ 2026Motorola Razr+ 2026≈ $1,1007.7
Design
Weight199 g189 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.1 mm
Height171.5 mm171.4 mm
Width74 mm74 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursPantone: Orient Blue, CocoaPantone: Mountain View
Display
Screen size7″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,084 px
Resolution (height)2,992 px2,640 px
Pixel density462 ppi414 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,486 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.3%85.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.47 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 735
AnTuTu score2,256,5911,846,775
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,6515,001
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,865—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh4,500 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)16.6 h—
Wired charging68 W45 W
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle51 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsMotorola Razr 70 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Fold8vsMotorola Razr 70 Ultra8.89.4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare