How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70+ vs X Fold5

Motorola Razr 70+ vs Vivo X Fold5

What Razr 70+ does better (5) and where X Fold5 wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70+
Motorola · 2026Razr 70+
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ $1,050
vs
Vivo X Fold5
Vivo · 2025X Fold5
9.0Score
17 advantages≈ $920
Higher score
9.2Display9.4
6.2Camera8.7
5.8Battery9.3
6.1Features6.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70+X Fold5
74 × 171.47.1142.3 × 159.74.3
Razr 70+X Fold5Difference
Height171.4 mm159.7 mm+11.7 mm
Width74 mm142.3 mm−68.3 mm
Thickness7.1 mm4.3 mm+2.8 mm
Weight189 g217 g−28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70+ better than X Fold5?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  2. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold5: No
  3. eSIMYes · X Fold5: No
  4. Weight189 g vs 217 g+15%
  5. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%

Why is X Fold5 better than Razr 70+?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
  2. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 70+: Yes
  5. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  6. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
  7. Wireless charging power15 W vs 40 W2.7×
  8. Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
  9. Resolution (width)1,084 px vs 2,200 px2×
  10. Max video4K vs 8K
  11. Screen size6.9″ vs 8″+16%
  12. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 70+Motorola Razr 70+≈ $1,0507.5
Vivo X Fold5Vivo X Fold5≈ $9209.0
Design
Weight189 g217 g
Thickness7.1 mm4.3 mm
Height171.4 mm159.7 mm
Width74 mm142.3 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP48IP58
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursPantone: Mountain ViewTitanium Gray, Green, White
Display
Screen size6.9″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,084 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,480 px
Pixel density414 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,916 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.1%90.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 750
AnTuTu score—1,883,303
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,483
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,739
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—13.3 h
Wired charging45 W80 W
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised34
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle49 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—

Related comparisons

Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsVivo X Fold5Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsVivo X Fold58.59.0
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare